Cases 11 - 20 of 23,682
Hazen v. Lear et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Mason R Hazen
Defendant:
Trey D Lear, Blake Gruny, Bradley M Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Chavez v. East Bay Drayage Drivers Security Fund Plan et al
as 3:2024cv03487
Plaintiff:
Leah Chavez
Defendant:
East Bay Drayage Drivers Security Fund Plan, East Bay Drayage Drivers Security Fund Plan Board of Trustees, Corcoran Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bradley v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv03429
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, Sherisse Birch and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, Ron Broomfield and T. Ismans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levin et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Erik Levin, Jonathan Jordan and Bradley Friedman
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Danitz v. Notbohm
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Bradley John Danitz
Defendant:
Rodell Notbohm
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
BENDER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BENDER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
