Cases 11 - 20 of 24
COOPER v. MARTUCCHI et al
as 2:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
HOWARD COOPER
Defendant:
MARTUCCHI, WALTER, BURNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Blondell Simmons
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal, D.M. Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnhart v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2011cv05845
Plaintiff:
Michael A Burnhart
Defendant:
State of Washington and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnhart v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv05172
Plaintiff:
Michael Burnhart
Defendant:
Scott Holder, Nancy Davis, Gary Bohon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Beth et al
as 2:2010cv00997
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Beth, Monica Hoff, Julie Brodsko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central Progressive Bank v. Kuntz et al
as 2:2008cv04147
Plaintiff:
Central Progressive Bank and Central Progressive Bank
Defendant:
Joseph R. Kuntz, Joseph R. Kuntz, David M. Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Burnhart v. Vail
as 3:2008cv05204
Plaintiff:
Michael A Burnhart
Defendant:
Eldon Vail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Banks v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2008cv00774
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Banks, Sr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Jo Anne B Burnhart, Harrace Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Banks v. Social Security Administration et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN MISC 08-95. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2008mc00095
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Banks, Sr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Jo Anne B Burnhart, Harrace Dickerson and others
Burnhart v. Wazinski et al
as 3:2007cv05425
Plaintiff:
Michael A Burnhart
Defendant:
Sandra Wazinski, J West, McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
