Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinella v. City of Fayetteville, N.C. et al
as 5:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Mark Pinella
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, N.C., Christopher L. Cody, North Carolina Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raines v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2009cv01103
Plaintiff:
Rudy C. Raines
Defendant:
Matthew Mitchell, ABL Food Service, Davidson County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raimes v. Mitchell
as 3:2009cv01025
Plaintiff:
Rudy C. Raines
Defendant:
M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richoz et al v. Equity Trust Co.
as 1:2009cv05843
Plaintiff:
William R Richoz, Carolyn S Richoz, Keith A. Raines and others
Defendant:
Equity Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Rains v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
Linda C Rains
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Raines v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Superior Court for Worcester County, Probation Office et al
as 1:2007cv00251
Petitioner:
Donald C. Raines
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Superior Court for Worcester County, Probation Office and NH State Prison, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raines v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Raines
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rains v. State of Kansas
as 5:2007cv03015
Petitioner:
Randall C. Rains
Respondent:
State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
