Cases 11 - 20 of 31
USA v. Carlos Plancarte-Benitez
as 18-10279
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS PLANCARTE-BENITEZ, also known as Carlos Benitez-Plancarte
Carlos Gonzalez-Benitez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72643
Petitioner:
CARLOS GONZALEZ-BENITEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority v. Vitol S.A. et al -
as 3:2017cv01999
Plaintiff:
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
Defendant:
Vitol S.A. , Vitol, Inc. , Carlos M. Benitez, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Autoridad de Energia Electrica, et al v. Vitol Inc., et al
as 16-1438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY (PREPA) and AUTORIDAD DE ENERGIA ELECTRICA DE PUERTO RICO
Interested Party:
PETRO WEST, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
VITOL SA SERVICES, LLC and VITOL, INC.
Defendant:
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND, FULANO DE TAL, FIADORAS A, B AND C and others
USA v. Jose Martinez-Aguilar
as 15-2044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE EFRAIN MARTINEZ-AGUILAR, also known as Carlos Oreana Benitez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benitez v. USA
as 1:2014cv01539
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos A Benitez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Carlos Aros-Benitez
as 12-50546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS AROS-BENITEZ
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. El Muelle Group, Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv01779
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
El Muelle Group, Corp. and Carlos Alexander Benitez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
