Cases 11 - 20 of 852
Gonzalez v. Carmona et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant:
Julio Carmona, Peter Torres, Juan Palafox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carmona v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Carmona
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Virgilio Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carmona Perez v. Kellermeyer Bergensons Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
LESLIE CARIME CARMONA PEREZ
Defendant:
KELLERMEYER BERGENSONS SERVICES LLC,, FERNANDEZ CLEANING SERVICES LLC,, EMILIO FERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carmona v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alondra Carmona
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carmona Escott v. Garland
as 24-134
Petitioner:
SANDRA ROCIO CARMONA ESCOTT
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ishak v. Greensburg Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Akuwa Ishak
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Hammond Police Department, Edwin Bergeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mahone v. Duval County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jerome Mahone
Defendant:
Duval County Jail, D. Cope, Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmona Ruiz, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3934
Petitioner:
ERISELA CARMONA RUIZ and ANA ERILETH HERRERA CARMONA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Javier Carmona-Albarran v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3278
Petitioner:
JAVIER CARMONA-ALBARRAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Labarbera v. Carmona Suarez et al
as 8:2023cv02700
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Labarbera
Defendant:
Osniel Carmona Suarez, Rayden Rodriguez Morejon and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
