Cases 11 - 20 of 354
Lannom et al v. Cousins et al
as 3:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Lannom and Christina Lannom
Defendant:
W. Mark Cousins and Ginja Cousins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv02538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY RICE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
MR. DICKERSON and MR. PHILLIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nigro v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Nigro
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Donald (Moore)
as 23-6779
Defendant:
TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES, TRAVON JONES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRONE MOORE and Ty Ralph Lauren
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03307
Plaintiff:
Billy James Lewis, Patrick Joseph Jessee, Fidel Jimenez, Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ball v. Hawkins
as 1:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Ball
Respondent:
Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ball v. Hawkins
as 5:2023hc02134
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Ball
Respondent:
Warden Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes v. Hardin et al
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Mayes
Defendant:
Charles Hardin, Logan County Jail, Captain Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
