Cases 11 - 20 of 33
David Mays v. Chris Johnson, et al
as 19-5211
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS BAKER and CHRIS JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MAYS
Sullivan v. Fountain et al
as 1:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
Albert Fountain, Chris Baker, Ian Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Stamford Police Dept et al
as 3:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Frank Green, Sr.
Defendant:
Stamford Police Dept, Terry Lauf, James Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirby et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02543
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kirby and Adrian Kirby
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc , Smith & Nephew Inc, Orthopaedic Division , Smith & Nephew Inc, Orthopaedic Reconstruction and Traumatic Divisions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Burgo et al
as 1:2015cv01426
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Joseph Burgo, Gary Lee, Chris Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Hamilton, et al.
as 1:2014cv01126
Plaintiff:
Dashel Marcellus Johnson
Defendant:
C. Hamilton, Chris Baker, Karen Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv06281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
J & E Land Company Inc et al v. Baker et al
as 6:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
J & E Land Company Inc and Gerald Wayne Ivey
Defendant:
Chris Baker , Baker & Associates LLC , Baker Real Estate Valuation and others
Intervenor:
Green Top Bar B Que and John P Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Lai v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00890
Defendant:
ATF, Chris Baker, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Hongan Lai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
