Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Stein v. Boingo Wireless, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03152
Defendant:
Kathy Misunas, Maury Austin, Lance Rosenzweig and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Davis, Jr. et al
as 4:2018cv04157
Plaintiff:
Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Chuck Davis Farms, LLC, Davis Pecans, LLC, Charles Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mud Creek Land Company, LLC v. Davis Pecans, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00118
Defendant:
Chuck Davis Farms, LLC, Garland Agviation, LLC and Davis Pecans, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mud Creek Land Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAIRFAX v. WOOD et al
as 4:2016cv00526
Defendant:
MIKE WOOD , LEON COUNTY , JOHN SCHMIDT and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD J FAIRFAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. The City Of New York ,
as 1:2016cv03445
Plaintiff:
Violeta Hernandez, Jerome Adams, Mechelle Agard and others
Defendant:
The City Of New York,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SCOTT v. SCHMIDT et al
as 4:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
NAY'LOR SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHN SCHMIDT and CHUCK DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Schmidt et al
as 6:2015cv01840
Plaintiff:
Nay'lor Scott
Defendant:
John Schmidt and Chuck Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUMPKIN v SCHMIDT et al
as 4:2015cv00468
Plaintiff:
JYRONE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
JOHN SCHMIDT, MIKE WOODS and CHUCK DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roggow et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company et al
as 5:2014cv00888
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Roggow and Theresa Roggow
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and Chuck Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
G.A. v. Las Cruces Public Schools et al
as 2:2012cv00839
Defendant:
Las Cruces Public Schools , Carmen Gallegos-Marrujo , Chuck Davis and others
Plaintiff:
G. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
