Cases 11 - 20 of 105
WHITEHEAD, ET AL. v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. WHITEHEAD and SHARON WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ASCO VALVE, INC. , AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knoll v. A.H. Bennett Company et al
as 3:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
Wallace Knoll
Defendant:
A.H. Bennett Company , A.L. Crump and Company, Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Great American E&S Insurance Company et al v. Cottrell, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03310
Plaintiff:
Great American E&S Insurance Company and Great American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cottrell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Burdess et al v. Cottrell, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01515
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Burdess and Lisa Burdess
Defendant:
Cottrell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodard v. A.H. Bennett Company et al
as 3:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dannis B. Woodard
Defendant:
A.H. Bennett Company , A.L. Crump and Company, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McCue v. Cottrell, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01178
Defendant:
Cottrell, Inc. and Pacific Motor Trucking Company
Plaintiff:
David McCue, Jr and Shawn McCue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NOT USED
as 4:2016cv01176
Defendant:
David McCue, Shawn McCue, Cottrell Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOT USED
as 4:2016cv01175
Plaintiff:
David McCue
Defendant:
Cottrell Inc and Pacific Motor Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2016cv02934
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Matthews, Sr
Defendant:
3M Company , Bayer Cropscience Inc , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Cottrell, Inc
as 1:2016at00459
Plaintiff:
John H. Baker
Defendant:
Cottrell, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
