Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl Removal- Fair Labor Standards Act
LASSITER v. ADERHOLT et al
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, RICK ALLEN, JODEY ARRINGTON and others
Debtor:
RANDY WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Burnham v. Chabot
as 22-1827
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Burnham
Defendant / Appellee:
Rae Lee Chabot, in her Official capacity as Judge/Actor of the State of Michigan
Zelesnik v. McConnell et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Senator Mitch McConnell, Senator Rob Portman, Steve Chabot and others
Bukasa v. The AMC et al
as 4:2022cv02861
Plaintiff:
Laeticia Bukasa
Defendant:
The AMC, Essex, CoWorking Spaces at Conglese Communty of California, Texas; DC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Clarke v. Waters et al
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Maxine Waters, John Tune, Marsha Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Rosado et al
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Medgine Sarah Jean and Brandako, Inc.
Defendant:
Rossana Rosado, Emanuel Cleaver, Sam Grawes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chabot v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joyce L. Chabot
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burnham v. Chabot
as 6:2021cv06669
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Burnham
Defendant:
Rae Lee Chabot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
