Cases 11 - 20 of 1,334
Linton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Linton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Johnson
as 24-50069
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Edward Johnson
Balwin Hills Investors Ltd. v. Charles Finley, Jr.
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Balwin Hills Investors Ltd. and Baldwin Hills Investors, LTD.
Defendant:
Charles Edward Finley, Jr. individually, and doing business as My Mailbox
Charles Edward Daniels v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00359
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Carr v. Rockingham Regional Jail
as 7:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
VA Doc Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Dillahunty et al
as 3:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Jairus Mann and Jairus Devon Mann
Defendant:
Charles Edward Dillahunty, Transam Trucking, Inc. and Charles Edward Dillahunty, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Carr v. Washington County TN Jail
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Washington County TN Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. R.S.W. Jail
as 7:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
R.S.W. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
