Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
RUSH v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02864
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: KELLY D. RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RUSH v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05917
Plaintiff: JEFFREY D. RUSH
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter et al v. File Depot, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05585
Plaintiff: Tim Potter , Mari Potter , TMP Ventures, LLC and others
Defendant: File Depot, LLC, A.G. Crowe, Rob Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise
O'Neal v. Rush et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00675
Plaintiff: Glenn David O'Neal
Defendant: D. Rush, F. Flores, Ragan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00019
Plaintiff: Dwight D Rush and Phyllis Rush
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc, Wright Medical Group, Inc and Wright Medical Group, N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rush v. Lauderdale County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2015cv00027
Plaintiff: Jimmy D. Rush, Jr.
Defendant: State of Mississippi and Unknown Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
El v. Robinson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv14957
Plaintiff: Reginald El
Defendant: Robinson, Shafua, El Rod and others
Rayshon Thomas v. Avela et al
as 2:2012cv09778
Defendant: Warden S Anderson, CO Avela, Gov E Brown, Sr and others
Plaintiff: Rayshon Thomas
Thomas v. McEwen et al
as 3:2012cv02651
Plaintiff: Rayshon Thomas
Defendant: L. S. McEwen, G. J. Janda, M. Martell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. McEwen et al
as 3:2012cv02589
Plaintiff: Rayshon Thomas
Defendant: L. S. McEwen, G. J. Janda, M. Martell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?