Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Cross v. GRIFFIN et al
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Defendant:
SABRIYA GRIFFIN and Attorney Chavene B. King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. ABNEY-BROTZ et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. CROSS
Defendant:
ABNEY-BROTZ, SASHER, WOOFAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. STEVEN et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Petitioner:
DARRELL D CROSS
Respondent:
SHERIFF CHRISTOPHER STEVEN and DAVIDSON SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blackwell-Esters et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2021cv11586
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Blackwell-Esters and Tyrese Jackson
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Kayla Roe, Lamont Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Williams v. Roe et al
as 2:2021cv11578
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Raynard Williams
Defendant:
Kayla Roe, Lamont Nelson, Alejandro Vela M. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lincoln Benefit Life Company v. Cross, et al
as 3:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Defendant:
Ashley Cross, Dana Cross, Pauline D Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02266
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Eric D Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CROSS v. DAVIDSON et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Burke, KECIA DAVIDSON, SERGEANT LOCKETTE and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSS v. DAVIDSON et al
as 5:2020cv00337
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SID ANDREWS, OFFICER GORDON, KECIA DAVIDSON and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D CROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23887
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP D CROSS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
