Cases 11 - 20 of 637
Nicholas Somberg v. Karen McDonald
as 23-1872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS PAUL SOMBERG
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN D. MCDONALD, in her official capacity as Prosecutor of Oakland County, MI
McDonald v. Devinney et al
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. McDonald
Defendant:
Kelly Devinney, Brittany Wharton and Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv02131
Plaintiff:
Zanis D. McDonald
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv11955
Plaintiff:
Brandon Tucker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Troy, City of, Sheldon G Larky and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11672
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDonald v. McDonald et al
as 3:2023cv00931
Defendant:
Susan McDonald, Herman Keith McDonald, Susan Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Larry D McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
McDonald v. Shebel et al
as 1:2022cv06489
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. McDonald and Christopher O. McDonald
Defendant:
Susan Shebel, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv06983
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Secretary Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, J. Peefley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 2:2022cv01691
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, J. Peefley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
