Cases 11 - 20 of 125
ARCHIE et al v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 1:2021cv01095
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR., ALUJAMA SHAKUR, KAREEM BLOCKER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Christopher Chin-Young v. US
as 20-1176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CHIN-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN D. COLE, ASHTON B. CARTER, DOD Secretary, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
SPENCER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv14773
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A, Agnes E. Poe, Elizabeth A. Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Pabon Gonzalez et al v. Congdon, John et al
as 3:2019cv00333
Plaintiff:
Pabon Gonzalez, Robert D. Spencer and Helson Pabon Gonzalez
Defendant:
Cp. Cruz, Mark Schomisch, John Congdon and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Commisoner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00431
Defendant:
Commisoner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Cassandra D. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spencer, Payton v. Tegels, Lizzie et al
as 3:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Payton D Spencer
Defendant:
Christopher Buesgen, Ashley Hakes and Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
