Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,611
Murphy v. Schaible, et al
as 24-1156
Plaintiff: DIANNA CHRISTINE MURPHY
Defendant: THOMAS SCHAIBLE and SCHAIBLE, RUSSO & COMPANY, C.P.A.'S, L.L.P.
Smith v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02923
Plaintiff: Dianna Smith
Defendant: Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keene v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01379
Scott, et al v. County of Kern, et al
as 1:2024at00298
Plaintiff: Dianna Scott and Keaton Edward Monroe
Defendant: County of Kern and Donny Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott, et al v. County of Kern, et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff: Dianna Scott and Keaton Edward Monroe
Defendant: County of Kern and Donny Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Viveros v. Garda CL Southeast, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80411
Plaintiff: Dianna J Viveros
Defendant: Garda CL Southeast, Inc., GardaWorld Cashlink, LLC. and GardaWorld Cash Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff: Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant: Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff: Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant: State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cravens v. Garda CL Southeast, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80400
Plaintiff: Andre Cravens, Gwendolyn Kennedy, Jeremy Angelle and others
Defendant: Garda CL Southeast, Inc., GardaWorld CashLINK LLC, GardaWorld Cash Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?