Cases 11 - 20 of 45
SCOTT et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 1:2019cv02498
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DONALD V. SCOTT, EARL-SCOTT Y. LAWANDA and LAWANDA YVETTE EARL-SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Scott, et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
as 19-2113
Appellee:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., David Boman, Southlaw, P.C., Rob Clifton and others
Appellant:
Donald Henderson Scott and Carolyn Yvonne Scott
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00944
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Scott v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 3:2018cv00334
Petitioner:
Donald F Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott #483052 v. Skipper
as 1:2018cv00492
Petitioner:
Donald Allen Scott #483052
Respondent:
Greg Skipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS v. SCOTT
as 1:2017cv02384
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
DONALD L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS et al v. STATE OF KANSAS et al
as 1:2017cv02394
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS and ANTALT J.S. JENKINS
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, DONALD L. SCOTT, SENTENCING JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04554
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Scott , Nicole Leigh Scott and Corey Scott
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Scott v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv14213
Plaintiff:
Donald U Scott
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
