Cases 11 - 20 of 166
Eun Kim v. Parcel K- Tudor Hall Farm LLC
as 23-1482
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN O. KIM, CHIN KIM, DANIEL I. KIM and others
Plaintiff:
AMY HSIANG-CHI TONG and HONG S. CHUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
PARCEL K- TUDOR HALL FARM LLC
Bryant v. McLean et al
as 1:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Jamus Oran Bryant
Defendant:
Bonnie Heather McLean, Bonnie (I) Heather McLean, Christina Apostoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ormsby v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2023cv11214
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Ormsby
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Daniel I Werfel and others
Green v. Werfel
as 3:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Clinton Green, Sr.
Defendant:
Daniel I. Werfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Menge v. Werfel
as 23-1245
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYAN EDWARD MENGE
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brandon Eugene Hunter v. Richard Acosta et al
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hunter
Defendant:
Richard Acosta, Mike Nelson, Jamie Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERRETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23712
Plaintiff:
DANIEL I STERRETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolfe v. Calhoun
as 1:2022cv01935
Plaintiff:
Colton Wolfe
Defendant:
Daniel Calhoun, Daniel (I) Calhoun, Allen Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOWNING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07248
Plaintiff:
DANIEL I DOWNING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
