Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Farr v. Davis et al
as 2:2016cv02180
Plaintiff:
Joan E. Farr
Defendant:
Daryl Davis , Dennis Moon , DeAnn Coote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Juan Daryl Davis and Renee Davis
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Chesapeake Operating Inc et al
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Daryl Davis , Nicole Davis , Joel Bradley Van Pelt and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating Inc and BHP Billiton Petroleum (Fayetteville) LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Clarita Operating LLC-Arkansas and Deep Six Water Disposal Services LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Chesapeake Operating Inc and BHP Billiton Petroleum (Fayetteville) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Daryl Davis
as 13-15533
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARYL DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Davis et al v. County of Santa Clara
as 5:2012cv02559
Plaintiff:
Daryl Davis , Edward Galetti and James Jones
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barrett v. Davis
as 1:2011cv00487
Plaintiff:
Theresa Barrett
Defendant:
Daryl Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrett v. Davis
as 1:2011cv00471
Plaintiff:
Theresa Barrett
Defendant:
Daryl Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv02148
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD GREEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE , PATRICK R. DONAHOE and DARYL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Davis v. City of Sunrise
as 0:2010cv61243
Plaintiff:
Daryl Davis
Defendant:
City of Sunrise a Florida Municipality and Ashley Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
