Cases 11 - 20 of 444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Buckman v. Miller
as 1:2023cv02868
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Paul Buckman
Defendant:
Mr. David Warren Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lawtone-Bowles v. Thornburgh et al
as 1:2023cv04813
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lawtone-Bowles
Defendant:
Richard E. Thornburgh, Bradley W. Dougan, John G. Popp and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stevenson v. Thornburgh et al
as 1:2023cv04458
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Stevenson
Defendant:
Richard E Thornburgh, Bradley W Dougan, John G Popp and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Robert S Shafir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brooks v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv21192
Plaintiff:
Sobers Brooks
Defendant:
Renita Henry, Emily Phillips, Deborah Nabat Frankel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY MILLER and DAVID HENRY-MILLER
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., HENRY NORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCOTT MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRANCIS MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Laurens Sheriff's Department et al
as 8:2022cv04671
Plaintiff:
David Justin Miller
Defendant:
Laurens County Sheriff Department, Sheriff Don Reynolds, Major Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24135
Plaintiff:
DAVID ASHTON MILLER and DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
