Cases 11 - 20 of 25
FRAZIER v. WHITE
as 1:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO FRAZIER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dumas et al
as 2:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
Mark Trenton Williams
Defendant:
Captain Dumas, Sheriff Hobe Runion, Corporal Ashley Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andino-Hernandez v. Mason et al
as 3:2021cv01570
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Andino-Hernandez
Defendant:
Ms. Mason, Deputy White, Deputy Stetler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mars v. Dumas et al
as 2:2021cv02145
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Mars
Defendant:
Captain Dumas, Sheriff Colby Runion, Deputy Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINHA v. MASON et al
as 2:2020cv06436
Plaintiff:
ARUNABH SINHA, DANIEL BERTHOLF, MR. CHRISTOPHER CASSEL and others
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MEDICAL COMPANY, I-UNIT SGT. MIDDLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Polo v. County of Los Angeles
as 2:2020cv04857
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Deputy White, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Polo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Emsweller et al
as 6:2020cv06007
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jackson, A. Ruh, Sergeant Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY et al
as 1:2019cv00241
Defendant:
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, CO MCKOY, DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ALEXANDER WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayworth v. White et al
as 4:2018cv04152
Defendant:
Deputy Ewing, Figuerroa, Lieutenant Maxwell and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Edmond Hayworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bob Ahmadi v. Sergeant Jones, et al
as 16-11667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB AHMADI, also known as Robert Abraham Kennedy
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT JONES, KATIE WOODS, Tarrant County Assistant District Attorney, GEORGE V. MACKEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
