Cases 11 - 20 of 3,210
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Antonio Jones v. NJ Doc Central Transportation, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., DR. JAMES K. LIU, Rutgers Neurosurgeon and others
Evitch v. DOC Division of Community Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Aarron L Evitch
Defendant:
DOC Division of Community Corrections, Shirley Haese-Whitman and Stephanie Dormady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AZCONA v. CAMDEN COUNTY DRUG COURT, et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6381
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Donald Higgs v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1712
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN, Esq., NJ DOC Commissioner, M. CHERY, Corrections Officer and others
Aguilar v. County of Pima, et al.
as 24-2440
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AGUILAR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CHRIS NANOS, STEPHEN PERKO, per Answer at Doc. 39 and others
Carter v. Stubbs et al
as 1:2024mc00192
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Calli A. Stubbs and DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Vaughan v. Burnice Mace
as 24-6317
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Defendant:
BURNICE MACE, RN, BSN, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, in whole capacity, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
