Cases 11 - 20 of 25
WOOD v. KINSAUL et al
as 5:2015mc00006
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EARL WOOD
Defendant:
BILL KINSAUL, JODY WALLS and HARRY HENTZ MCCLELLAN
Woods v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Woods
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wood v. Leonard
as 6:2013cv01024
Plaintiff:
Brant Earl Wood
Defendant:
Amey Lynn Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Woods v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00823
Petitioner:
Bobby Earl Woods
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04027
Plaintiff:
Tanika Bell , Linda Woods , Jarrett Earl Woods and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bell et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04007
Plaintiff:
Tanika Bell , Linda Woods , Jarrett Earl Woods and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, LLC, Cavalier Homes, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ronnell Earl Woods v. Derral Adams
as 5:2003cv00990
Respondent:
Derral Adams
Unknown:
Case Assignment Administrator, Dep In Chg So Div, James V Selna and others
Petitioner:
Ronnell Earl Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv80417
Plaintiff:
TRESSIE WOOD and JOHN EARL WOOD
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv06394
Plaintiff:
Tanika Bell, Tanika Bell, Tanika Bell and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, LLC, Cavalier Homes, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
