Cases 11 - 20 of 1,356
Bailey v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Elbert Earl Bailey
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. Mario Elbert
as 24-10360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO LENARD ELBERT
Walker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
ELBERT WALKER, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Bryant v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Elbert Bryant
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hernandez v. Norton, et al
as 24-1025
Plaintiff:
JOEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
TIM NORTON, ELBERT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and MIKE SKALISKY
Annie Grant, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia
as 24-10241
Plaintiff:
ANNIE LOIS GRANT, QUENTIN T. HOWELL, ELROY TOLBERT and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
James Elbert, III v. USA
as 24-1034
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES M. ELBERT, III
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as ALN/2:24-CV-00024
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Corporation Amerex and others
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals AMericas Inc, Corporation Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
