Cases 1 - 10 of 1,354
In re: Elbert Walker
as 24-11154
Petitioner:
In re: ELBERT WALKER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Williams v. Smith
as 24-760
Petitioner:
STEPHEN J. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
DARYL NORVAL SMITH, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as a representative for the FAA administrator, JASON AUBREY GEORGE, in his official capacity as manager of the FAA Bradley Flight Standards District Office, now retired, BILLY JOE NOLEN, in his capacity as the acting administrator of the FAA and others
KITCHEN v. CHAN et al
as 2:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY KITCHEN
Defendant:
ELBERT CHAN, 7248 ADULT DAY CARE, INC. doing business as ASSURED CARE CENTER DAYCARE and 7248 HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Rogers v. Shoshone County, et al.
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Richard Elbert Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Shoshone County, Shoshone County Sheriff's Office, Schwartz Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Fuller
as 24-7013
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ELBERT ANDREW FULLER, JR.
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarmon v. Comal County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ersala Jarmon
Defendant:
Comal County Jail, Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Officer FNU Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. GEORGIA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
ELBERT ROMAN TATE
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Elbert Earl Bailey
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. Mario Elbert
as 24-10360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO LENARD ELBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
