Cases 11 - 18 of 18
McCray v. Moore et al
as 4:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Otis McCray
Defendant:
Fred Moore and Larry Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv88962
Plaintiff:
FRED MOORE, JR. and FRED MOORE, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Moore et al v. City of DeSoto et al
as 3:2009cv00710
Plaintiff:
Fred Moore, Tanya Moore and Karmen Shaver
Defendant:
City of DeSoto, City of DeSoto, Erin Blust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IBEW-NECA Local 505 Welfare and Pension Plans et al v. Carlson Electrical Construction, LLC
as 1:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
IBEW-NECA Local 505 Welfare and Pension Plans, Donald L. Adams, Fred Moore and others
Defendant:
Carlson Electrical Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IBEW-NECA Local 505 Welfare and Pension Plans et al v. R.D. Electric, LLC
as 1:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
IBEW-NECA Local 505 Welfare and Pension Plans, Donald L. Adams, Fred Moore and others
Defendant:
R.D. Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Lawrence Moore Ogar & Jacobs et al
as 1:2008cv01350
Plaintiff:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lawrence Moore Ogar & Jacobs, William . Lawrence, Fred Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Parker v. Currie, et al
as 08-41023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE JOE PARKER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
CURRIE, Warden, SMITH, Major, SHACKLEFORD, Classifications and others
Parker v. Currie et al
as 9:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Clyde Joe Parker, II
Defendant:
Unidentified Currie, Unidentified Smith, Unidentified Shackleford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
