Cases 11 - 20 of 144
Clary Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv01784
Plaintiff:
Jamel G.E. Clary Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. G.E. YUN., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
G.E. YUN., INC. and YONG KIL YUN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zobay et al v. MTN Group Limited et al
as 1:2021cv03503
Plaintiff:
Hamid Mughal, Veronica Hickman, David Eugene Hickman and others
Defendant:
MTN Group Limited, MTN Dubai Limited, ZTE Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jason Patterson, et al v. Haier U.S. Appliance Solutions
as 21-90004
Petitioner:
H.P. and JASON PATTERSON
Respondent:
HAIER U.S. APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS INC., d.b.a. G.E. Appliances
ROBERTS v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2020cv00450
Defendant:
JUDGE G.E. "BO" ADAMS, ROBINS FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION, ATLANTA POSTAL CREDIT UNION and others
Plaintiff:
STACEY HASLEM ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
