Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Gail F Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CATONZARO et al v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
GAIL F. CATONZARO and TONY A. CATONZARO, JR.
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joseph F., et al v. Sinclair Services Company, et al
as 16-4028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH F., individually and as guardians of N.F., a minor and GAIL F., individually and as guardians of N.F., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
SINCLAIR SERVICES COMPANY and SINCLAIR SERVICES COMPANY POINT OF SERVICE BASIC PLAN, (POS Basic)
F. et al v. QualCare et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gail F. and Kaitlyn F.
Defendant:
QualCare and Meridian Health Team Member Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McGee et al v. Constant Contact, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13114
Plaintiff:
William McGee and Lee McGee
Defendant:
Constant Contact, Inc. , Gail F. Goodman and Harpreet S. Grewal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lanham v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02532
Plaintiff:
Gail F. Lanham
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lanham v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-30681
Plaintiff:
Gail F. Lanham
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
ELLMAN v. AFFINITY GLOBAL, INC.
as 2:2015cv01297
Plaintiff:
GAIL F. ELLMAN
Defendant:
AFFINITY GLOBAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
