Cases 11 - 20 of 27
GwanJun Kim v. Grand Valley State University, et al
as 16-2321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GWANJUN KIM
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY, THOMAS J. HAAS, GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION and others
Matthews v. Denso Manufacturing Arkansas Inc
as 3:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
Gregory Matthews
Defendant:
Denso Manufacturing Arkansas Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Gary Williams v. Carl Eason
as 14-6684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL EASON, State Judge, Suffolk Circuit Court, Mr. and GREGORY MATTHEWS, Attorney at law
Cleveland v. Barnette et al
as 9:2012cv00441
Petitioner:
Gregory Matthew Cleveland
Respondent:
Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cleveland v. United States of America, The et al
as 9:2012cv00411
Petitioner:
Gregory Matthew Cleveland
Respondent:
United States of America, The and William Norman Nettles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cleveland v. Barnette
as 9:2012cv00001
Petitioner:
Gregory Matthew Cleveland
Respondent:
Barry Barnette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cleveland v. Barnett et al
as 7:2011cv03073
Plaintiff:
Gregory Matthew Cleveland
Defendant:
Barry Barnett, United States of America and William Norman Nettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6990
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gary Williams v. David Simmon
as 11-6796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY B. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. SIMMONS, Superintendent, Western Tidewater Regional Jail, MASKELONY, Mr., Captain, Director of Security, Western Tidewater Regional Jail, RUSSELL MOULTON, Mr., Sergeant, Jail Guard, Western Tidewater Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv01335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
