Cases 11 - 20 of 11,237
Hayden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02381
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
WaCella M. Hayden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HAYDEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05970
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH HAYDEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hayden v. Viking Arms Condominium Association, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80523
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayden
Defendant:
Viking Arms Condominium Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caleel+Hayden LLC v. Ly Berditchev Corp.
as 1:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Caleel+Hayden, LLC doing business as Glo Skin Beauty
Defendant:
Ly Berditchev Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jarett v. Garnett, Kansas, City of, et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reese Jarett and Reese Jarett
Defendant:
Garnett, Kansas, City of, Anderson County, Kansas, Les McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
BUNE et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
SARAH BUNE, IAN D'SOUZA, MARK EDELSTEIN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HILL v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, Natasha Barkley, Mike Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
