Cases 11 - 20 of 240
Hufford v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
David Hufford and Lisa Hufford
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUFFORD v. Western Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
TRICIA HUFFORD
Defendant:
Western Mutual Insurance Company, Haag Engineering Company and SAMPSON NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hafif v. Mansour et al
as 1:2022cv01199
Not Classified By Court:
Abraham Manopla
Plaintiff:
Dibo Hafif
Defendant:
Rabbi Eli J. Mansour, Evet Balas, Captain Derby St. Fort and others
Interested Party:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Earl Robinson v. Christopher Hufford, et al
as 21-3043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER HUFFORD, YOKO SAVINO, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
JOYCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58003
Plaintiff:
HUFFORD JOYCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jessica Irving v. Steve Carr, et al
as 21-3823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA IRVING
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE CARR, NICOLE TYO, JENNIFER BOGENRIFE and others
Bebber v. CNET Media, Inc.
as 2:2021cv11824
Plaintiff:
Richard Bebber, Colin Custard, Sherry Bracy and others
Defendant:
CNET Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hufford v. Rutledge
as 4:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
William Hufford
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hufford v. The Bank of Fincastle et al
as 1:2021cv03594
Defendant:
Robert C. Wagner, George E. Holt, III, John W. Rader, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jill Hufford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
