Cases 11 - 20 of 4,472
Eagen et al v. The Carborundum Company et al
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jilynn Eagen, Edward Eagen and E.E.
Defendant:
The Carborundum Company, Town of Wheatfield, Crown Beverage Packaging, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2022cv00963
Defendant:
BWDAC, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Butler and Kathy Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant:
Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BATES et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01441
Plaintiff:
WARREN BATES and MARY LYNN BATES
Cross Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BROOKWOOD VENTURES, L.P., BW/IP, INC. and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., FLOWSERVE U.S. INC., GENUINE PARTS COMPANY d/b/a National Automotive Parts Association, a/k/a/ NAPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ortman v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05042
Plaintiff:
David Ortman
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Pennino et al v. Reilly-Benton Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Goulds Pumps IPG, LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Dana Companies LLC, Honeywell International Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
McDermott, Inc., Eagle Inc., Glazer Steel Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Pennino, Sally Pennino and Salvador Pennino
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Albert J. Bossier, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Link-Belt Construction Equipment Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jones et al v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00351
Defendant:
CNH Industrial America, LLC, Anco Insulations, Inc., The McCarty Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Keith Jones, Martin Jones, Barbara Lee and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Claims Resolution Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BRADFORD v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2019cv00128
Cross Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, WHEELER PROTECTIVE APPAREL INC, THE GAGE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
DEZURIK INC, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
CBS CORPORATION, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION, RAINBIRD CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MERLE WEST and JANICE E BRADFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
