Cases 11 - 19 of 19
William Victor, et al v. R. Lawler, et al
as 11-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
R. M. LAWLER, M. W. HARLOW, DORINA VARNER and others
Rindahl, Randy v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 3:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Tim Reisch, Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakes v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Phillip J Oakes
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelly, Micheal. Pheiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OAKES v. MOSS
as 2:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
DAVID J OAKES
Defendant:
JENNIFER L MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos v. Oakes et al
as 3:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jose Enrique Ramos
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Oakes, Correctional Officer J Cherry, Huntington State Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor, et al. v. Lawler et al
as 3:2007cv02058
Plaintiff:
William Victor and Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
R. M. Lawler, M. W. Harlow, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR FERGUSON et al v. DODD et al
as 2:2007cv02291
Plaintiff:
LINDA L. TAYLOR FERGUSON, JANET E. ROHRBACH and SUZANNE T. THOMPSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DODD and VALERIE J. OAKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oakes et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2007cv01999
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Oakes and Warner L. Oakes
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OAKES et al v. MERCK AND COMPANY INC
as 2:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA J OAKES and WARNER L OAKES
Defendant:
MERCK AND COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
