Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Jean Coulter v. Cathy Bissoon, et al
as 17-2950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHY BISSOON, District Judge, THEODORE A. MCKEE, Third Circuit Judge, ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, Third Circuit Judge and others
Jean Coulter v. Catherine Donnelly, et al
as 17-2868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LAURENCE DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER and LINN LAW GROUP
COULTER v. TATANANNI et al
as 2:2017cv00629
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
BLAZE TATANANNI, JEAN TATANANNI, MORGAN STANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulter v. Tatananni et al
as 1:2017cv02800
Plaintiff:
Jean Coulter
Defendant:
Blaze Tatananni, Jean Tatananni, Morgan Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulter v. ADT Security Services et al
as 9:2017cv80355
Plaintiff:
Jean Coulter
Defendant:
ADT Security Services and Apollo Global Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coulter v. Jamsan Hotel Management Inc., et al
as 17-1133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMSAN HOTEL MANAGEMENT INC., JAMSAN INVESTMENTS LLC, ARYAN HOSPITALITY LLC and others
Coulter v. Jamsan Hotel Management Inc, et al
as 17-1133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMSAN HOTEL MANAGEMENT INC, JAMSAN INVESTMENTS LLC, ARYAN HOSPITALITY LLC and others
COULTER v. BISSOON et al
as 2:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant:
CATHY BISSOON, THEODORE A. MCKEE, ANTHONY J. SCIRICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulter v. Jamsan Hotel Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12103
Defendant:
Jamsan Hotel Management, Inc, Choice Hotels, Jamsan Hotel Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Coulter and Jean Coulter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jean Coulter v. James Coulter
as 16-3053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. COULTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
