Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deonta Hicks v. Wendell Pixley
as 19-7502
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections and WENDELL W. PIXLEY, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEONTA JEROME HICKS
Hicks v. Pixley et al
as 1:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Deonta Jerome Hicks
Defendant:
Wendell W. Pixley, Harold Clarke and Dave Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First Acceptance Insurance Company Inc v. Blackshear
as 9:2015cv02577
Plaintiff:
First Acceptance Insurance Company Inc
Defendant:
Topeka Blackshear, Joe Jerome Hicks and James Ling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stacy Hicks v. Hubert Davi
as 15-60136
Petitioner - Appellant:
STACY JEROME HICKS
Respondent - Appellee:
HUBERT DAVIS, Warden
Dennis Anders, et al v. Medtronic, et al
as 14-8026
Respondent:
Dennis Brian Anders, Lara Anders, Regina Autrey and others
Petitioner:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does, 1-100
Dennis Anders, et al v. Medtronic, et al
as 14-8026
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Dennis Brian Anders, Lara Anders, Regina Autrey and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does, 1-100
Anders et al v. Medtronic Inc
as 4:2014cv01637
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brian Anders, Lara Anders, Regina Autrey and others
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anders et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brian Anders , Lara Anders , Regina Autrey and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.