Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Casey Tyler v. Katy Poole
as 19-7025
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL TORES, Captain, Individual capacity, KATY POOLE, Individual and official capacity, THORNE LOCKLEAR, Correctional officer, individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER
FORD v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2019cv00444
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SGT. CAMERON E. GADDY, LIEUTENANT KAREN HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS EMANUEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. SADIE et al
as 1:2019cv00115
Defendant:
SGT. MICHEAL JOHNSTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR., HEATHER SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. POOLE et al
as 1:2017cv01142
Plaintiff:
CASEY RAFEAL TYLER
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, WILLIAM BULLARD, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROMARTIE v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2017cv00980
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CROMARTIE, JR.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, TRAVIS BRIDGES, MICHEAL JOHNSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salyer et al v. J.D. Carty Resources, LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Lahoma Salyer , Gary Salyer , Jimmy Salyer and others
Defendant:
J.D. Carty Resources, LLC, Country Gas, LLC, Anaconda Drilling of KY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
INGRAM v. INDYGO
as 1:2015cv01623
Defendant:
INDYGO
Plaintiff:
JERRY INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michael Hunt v. Frank Perry
as 15-6892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON, PAT MCCRORY and others
HUNT v. PERRY et al
as 1:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT
Defendant:
FRANK PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON, PAT MCCRORY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMPKINS v. POOLE et al
as 1:2014cv01074
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
KATIE POOLE, WILLIAM BULLARD, JERRY INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
