Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Jackson-Bey v. Regions Hospital et al
as 0:2023cv02202
Plaintiff:
Jaleel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
Regions Hospital and Ramsey County ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOREMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23190
Plaintiff:
JALEEL FOREMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Duncan v. USA
as 5:2023cv00319
Petitioner:
Jaleel Duncan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Malik Laws v. Maricopa County Superior Court, et al
as 23-15424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, PHOENIX, CITY OF and MARICOPA, COUNTY OF
Malik Laws v. ADOC, et al
as 23-15423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ARIZONA, STATE OF
Malik Laws v. Glendale, City off, et al
as 23-15443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK JALEEL LAWS
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENDALE, CITY OFF and GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
