Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Washpon v. Jane/John Does 1 et al
as 6:2018cv00051
Defendant: Bexar County Sheriff Department, Brazos County Sheriff Department, City of Austin, TX and others
Plaintiff: Kathleen Julie Washpon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coit v. Zavaras, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant: JILL COIT
Defendant - Appellee: ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, JAMES WELTON, Director of C.I.D., LARRY REID, L.V.C.F. and others
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1385
Plaintiff - Appellee: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellant: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellee: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
WINTHROP v. YATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00836
Plaintiff: PAUL WINTHROP
Defendant: SHERRY YATES, JAMES SLAUGHTER, ANNIE MOTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Genesee County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00383
Plaintiff: Richard Mills
Defendant: Genesee County , Monroe County , Kathleen McCully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Trofatter v. Patricia Caruso, et al, et al
as 10-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL TROFATTER
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, named as "Patricia Carusa"; MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, MDOC Bureau of Health Care Services Administrator, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as "BHCS Board Members, Jane/John Does 1a thru 1f and others
Defendant: WALTER ORMES, Dr.; in his official and individual capacity, KEVIN MURPHY, D.D.S.; indentify on initiating document as Unknown Party #2 and DANIEL SPITTERS, P.A.; indentified on initiating document as Unknown Party #3
Michael Trofatter v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-1492
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL TROFATTER
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICIA CARUSO, named as "Patricia Carusa"; MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, MDOC Bureau of Health Care Services Administrator, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as "BHCS Board Members, Jane/John Does 1a thru 1f and others
Smith et al v. Maloon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00954
Plaintiff: Brock Smith, Brock Smith, Christral Smith and others
Defendant: Jerry L Maloon, II, David R Hunt, Lisa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Grooms et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv02371
Plaintiff: Bernice Boyd
Defendant: Robert Earl Grooms, Robert J. Jenkins, Jr., Diana M. Shupak and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?