Cases 11 - 20 of 73
GORMLY v. WALKER et al
as 1:2021cv02688
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GORMLY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INEZ SAKI-TAY, JAMES WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Arroyo v. Superintendent "John Doe" et al
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Defendant:
Captain(s) "John Doe", NS Superintendant "John Doe", The City of Newport News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Boyer et al
as 2:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Defendant:
Hampton Roads City Jail, Captain(s) "John Doe" ET. AL., The City of Newport News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Lt. "John" Ward
as 2:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Sgt. "John" Casper, Lt. "John" Ward, Captain(s) "John Does" and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Jackson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Unknown Borderline, Vital Core Strategies, Amanda Harris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blair Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv05400
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
John Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv03861
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Pelicia E. Hall and Marshal Turner
Plaintiff:
Benny Blansett, Steven Barnes, Darkeyus Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS v. BARNES et al
as 1:2019cv00151
Plaintiff:
DAMION BURNS
Defendant:
SHERIFF JOHN BARNES and SANDRA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
