Cases 11 - 20 of 101
HART v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18401
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HART v. PARKINSON
as 2:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
HART v. ANGELUCCI
as 2:2021cv05085
Petitioner:
JOHN HART
Respondent:
STEPHEN ANGELUCCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hart v. Scholl's Wellness Company, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
David John Hart
Defendant:
Scholl's Wellness Company, LLC, Caleres, Inc., Yellow Wood Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03989
Plaintiff:
John Hart
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28639
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. Hart
as 4:2021cv00648
Defendant:
John Hart
Plaintiff:
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc.
Clark et al v. Stanley Furniture Company LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Smith, Doug I. Payne, William G. Perdue and others
Defendant:
Stanley Furniture Company LLC, Supplemental Retirement Plan of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., Stone & Leigh, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
John Hart v. County of Philadelphia, et al
as 20-2886
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
