Cases 11 - 20 of 238
Pelayo v. Nations Roof West, LLC
as 1:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Ramirez Pelayo
Defendant:
Nations Roof West, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramirez Nazario v. Hood et al
as 5:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Juan Felix Ramirez Nazario
Defendant:
T C Hood and K and K Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ramirez-Campos v. Garland
as 23-849
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ-CAMPOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez v. Haverty Furniture Companies Inc
as 3:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Juan Molina Ramirez
Defendant:
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. and Haverty Furniture Companies Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Eubanks et al
as 0:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Andre S. Eubanks, Juan C. Ramirez and Maria C. Covaleda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19790
Plaintiff:
JUAN E RAMIREZ and JUAN ESTEBAN RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Juarez (Juan Roberto Ramirez)
as 22-2065
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Claudia Juarez, Omar Juarez Andrade, AKA Negro, Tomas Anzaldua, AKA Tommy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Roberto Ramirez, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00264
Petitioner:
Juan Domingo Ramirez
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
