Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Alexander Jones v. Kelly Jone
as 18-50482
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALEXANDER E. JONES
Defendant - Appellant:
KELLY R. JONES
Jones v. Jones
as 1:2018cv00318
Plaintiff:
Alexander E. Jones
Defendant:
Kelly R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Rios et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shiver, Angel M. Ruiz, Crystal Conner and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Essure Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
Charles Jones, Kevin Lavell Jones, Kelly Donnell Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rios et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01010
Plaintiff:
Christy Rios , Kelly Straley , Chrystal McManamon and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare, LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly Ray Jones v. USA
as 15-6432
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELLY RAY JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones v. United States of America
as 5:2014hc02131
Petitioner:
Kelly Ray Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
A.J. et al v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04057
Plaintiff:
A.J. and KELLY BROWN-JONES
Defendant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. , BRUNSWICK CORPORATION , ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and others
Cross_claimant:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cross_defendant:
BRUNSWICK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. United Recovery Systems, LP
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
Kelly A. Jones
Defendant:
United Recovery Systems, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Kelly Jones, et al
as 13-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY A. JONES and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
