Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Hudson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv23879
Plaintiff:
Rotha Hudson and Kenneth Hudson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY THOMAS
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, DON BLAKELY and KENNETH HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLINDER et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv04865
Plaintiff:
JUANITA ALLINDER , WILLIE BANKS , ANNA BEAVER and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Allinder et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03817
Plaintiff:
Juanita Allinder, Willie Banks, Anna Beaver and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Burns v. The City of New Rochelle et al
as 7:2012cv04713
Plaintiff:
Devonte Burns
Defendant:
The City of New Rochelle, Juan Torres, Kenneth Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Willie Glenn, et al v. City of Columbus, Georgia, et al
as 10-13389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. GLENN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lester Zachary and KAREN ZACHARY, Individually, and As Next Friend of Lester Zachary
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, RICHARD BOREN, Individually, and In his Official Capacity as Chief of Police, GARY A. BOLEN, Individually, and In his Officeal Capacity and others
Glenn et al v. City of Columbus, Georgia et al
as 4:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Glenn and Karen Zachary
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Georgia, City of Columbus, Georgia, City of Columbus, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
