Cases 11 - 20 of 663
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Mitchell Ray King, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
KING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Daniel M. King, JR, LLC v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. King, JR, LLC and Daniel M. King, Jr., LLC
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Unknown Defendants
as 9:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
King, Jr. v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Greg Abbott, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. DOOLY STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, JOHN OR JANE DOE, P A WOODARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
