Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Keith Davis v. Washington State Department of, et al
as 17-35943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH ADAIR DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Secretary and Assistant Secretary, G. HAMMOND, Medical Director, ADA COORDINATOR, WA State Dept of Corrections and others
Kinnamon v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 4:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Christina Kinnamon
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Davis v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05129
Plaintiff:
Keith Adair Davis
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, G Hammond, ADA Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sansovich v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv00838
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sansovich
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Great Lakes Cold Logistics, Inc. and William Kinnamon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Todd Lee Kinnamon v. Daniel Paramo
as 2:2013cv09561
Petitioner:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Todd Lee Kinnamon v. Daniel Paramo
as 2:2013cv07824
Petitioner:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Kinnamon et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv03755
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Kinnamon and Samuel Kinnamon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kinnamon v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Corcoran State Prison, Susan Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinnamon v. Hamilton, et al.
as 1:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
E. Hamilton and S. Rather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinnamon v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
E. Hamilton and S. Rather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
