Cases 11 - 20 of 185
Williams v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv05477
Plaintiff:
Demarko Deion Williams
Defendant:
The People of the State of Illinois, Kimberly M Foxx, Alan J Spellberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6048
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simpson v. City of Douglasville et al
as 1:2022cv05117
Plaintiff:
Cherly L. Simpson
Defendant:
City of Douglasville, Rochelle Robins, Travelers Insurance Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lisle, Jr. et al v. Simpson et al
as 1:2022cv05137
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Simpson, Hoffman, Rockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. CR Bard, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Simpson
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson v. Woodford County Jail
as 5:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Simpson
Defendant:
Woodford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson v. Knight et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Petitioner:
Roderick L. Simpson
Respondent:
Melissa Forsyth and Stevie Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCormack v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCormack
Defendant:
Raymond L. Simpson, Elizabeth F Simpson and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11193
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL L SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
