Cases 11 - 20 of 34
KENNEDY v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv02127
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LEE DAVID KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bromley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv00044
Plaintiff:
Maria Margarete Howard, Michael Joseph McAloon, Bruce Wayne Budrow and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv12807
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lee David Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
United States of America v. Estate of James Edward David, et al
as 5:2017cv01214
Defendant:
Judy G. Blackburn, Jeremy Lee David, Joshua James David and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Meskunas v. Auerbach, Esq et al
as 7:2017cv09129
Plaintiff:
Denise Meskunas , John A. Meskunas and Important Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Lee David Auerbach , Esq. and Lee David Auerbach, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. USA
as 1:2016cv01189
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lee David Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03487
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Davis and Glenn Lee David
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Douglas v. David
as 4:2014cv00727
Plaintiff:
Tammy Douglas
Defendant:
Ian Lee David
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shropshire v. USA
as 2:2014cv01154
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lee David Shropshire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
