Cases 11 - 20 of 489
JACKSON v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv21673
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
LISA M. JACKSON
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Penman et al
as 2:2019cv12505
Defendant:
Kim Worthy, Susan Dillion, Bolyd and others
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Williams
Ritz v. Jackson
as 1:2018cv01581
Plaintiff:
Anthony Obrian Ritz
Defendant:
Lisa M. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTS-JACKSON v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv16701
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
LISA WATTS-JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06801
Plaintiff:
LISA A. JACKSON
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv02850
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kay Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America and Priscilla Ann Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01412
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Moreno v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv06844
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Moreno
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Cyrus Vance , Lisa Friel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv02199
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Donnelly Villegas v. USA, et al
as 13-35843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELLY R. VILLEGAS, an enrolled member of the Spokane Tribe of Indians
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
