Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Reed v. Assurant, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01183
Plaintiff: Lacie Reed
Defendant: Assurant, Inc. , CMH Homes, Inc. , Bobby Joe Lavender, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Lititz Mutual Insurance Company v. Hendrick et al
as 7:2012cv00620
Defendant: Maetta H. Crewe and Fred E. Hendrick
Plaintiff: Lititz Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Burch, et al v. Lititz Mutual Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00107
Plaintiff: William Burch and Steffanie Burch
Defendant: Lititz Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_claimant: Lititz Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_defendant: Steffanie Burch and William Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Lititz Mutual Insurance Company v. Tyler
as 2:2010cv02100
Plaintiff: Lititz Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Linda Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Lititz Mutual Insurance Company v. Phoebus
as 1:2009cv01991
Plaintiff: Lititz Mutual Insurance Company and Lititz Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Anne M. Phoebus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract None
Wandling, et al v. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00422
Plaintiff: Sharon Wandling and George Wandling
Defendant: Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., HSBC Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Wandling et al v. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited et al
as 2:2008cv01030
Plaintiff: Sharon Wandling and George Wandling
Defendant: Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., HSBC Group and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?