Cases 11 - 20 of 689
Deane v. M&T Bank
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ryan Omowale Deane
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCloud v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Delores McCloud
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McKenzie v. M&T Bank
as 2:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
George McKenzie
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Other:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Default
Parker v. Clearpath Lending et al
as 3:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Natosha L. Parker
Defendant:
Clearpath Lending, US Bank, NA, M&T Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Brown, et al v. Cyrus Dolbin, et al
as 23-3143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON L. BROWN and A. M. B., Minor Child of Jason L. Brown
Defendant:
CYRUS P. DOLBIN, Judge, MARK A. BARKET, Custody Officer, KAREN E. RISMILLER, Lawyer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. DOMALAKES, Judge, DAVID RICE, Asst. DA, MICHEAL A. STINE, Public Defender and others
STANFORD et al v. H.S.B.C BANK et al
as 1:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. STANFORD and SOFTWHO
Defendant:
H.S.B.C BANK, BANK OF THE OZARKS, CHASE BANK, U.S. BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lind et al v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Lind and Michele Lind
Defendant:
Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc., Explore USA RV, Ltd. and M & T Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
